One of the most useful features of monikers is that you can concatenate or compose
monikers together. A composite moniker is a moniker that is a composition of
other monikers, and can determine the relation between the parts. This lets you
assemble the complete path to an object given two or more monikers that are
the equivalent of partial paths. You can compose monikers of the same class (like
two file monikers) or of different classes (like a file moniker and an item
moniker). If you were to write your own moniker class, you could also compose
your monikers with file or item monikers. The basic advantage of a composite is
that it gives you one piece of code to implement every possible moniker that is a
combination of simpler monikers. That reduces tremendously the need for
specific custom moniker classes.
Because monikers of different classes can be composed with one another,
monikers provide the ability to join multiple namespaces. The file system defines a
common namespace for objects stored as files because all applications understand
a file-system path name. Similarly, a container object also defines a private
namespace for the objects that it contains, because no container understands
the names generated by another container. Monikers allow these name spaces to be
joined because file monikers and item monikers can be composed. A moniker
client can search the namespace for all objects
using a single mechanism. The client simply calls IMoniker::BindToObject
on the moniker, and the moniker code handles the rest. A call to IMoniker::GetDisplayName
on a composite creates a name using the concatenation of all the individual
monikers' display names.
Furthermore, because you can write your own moniker class, moniker composition
allows you to add customized extensions to the namespace for objects.
Sometimes two monikers of specific classes can be combined in a special way.
For example, a file moniker representing an incomplete path and another file
moniker representing a relative path can be combined to form a single file moniker
representing the complete path. For example, the file monikers c:\work\art
could be composed with the relative file moniker ..\backup\myfile.doc
to equal c:\work\backup\myfile.doc
. This is an example of "non-generic" composition.
"Generic" composition, on the other hand, permits the connection of any two
monikers, no matter what their classes. For example, you could compose an item
moniker onto a file moniker, though not, of course, the other way around.
Because a non-generic composition depends on the class of the monikers
involved, its details are defined by a the implementation of a particular moniker
class. You can define new types of non-generic compositions if you write a new
moniker class. By contrast, generic compositions are defined by OLE. Monikers
created as a result of generic composition are called generic composite monikers.
These three classes -- file monikers, item monikers, and generic composite
monikers -- all work together, and they are the most commonly used classes of
Moniker clients should call IMoniker::ComposeWith
to create a composite on moniker with another. The moniker it is called on
internally decides whether it can do a generic or non-generic composition. If the
moniker implementation determines that a generic composition is usable, OLE
provides the CreateGenericComposite
API function to facilitate this.
- Software for developers
Software for Android Developers
- More information resources
Unix Manual Pages
- Databases for Amazon shops developers
Amazon Categories Database
Browse Nodes Database